Buddhism and Ecology: Balancing Convergence, Dissonance, and the Risk of Anachronism
English

Buddhism and Ecology: Balancing Convergence, Dissonance, and the Risk of Anachronism

Paul Waldau (Reviewer)
English
Journal
Journal of Buddhist Ethics, Volume 5, pp. 374-383
1998
10 pages
108 KB

Introduction

The review begins by locating the edited volume within the Harvard conference series on religion and ecology and assessing its geographical, doctrinal, and methodological scope. It then examines the risks involved in interpreting traditional Buddhist teachings through modern environmental categories, particularly the dangers of anachronism, revisionism, and conceptual oversimplification. Subsequent sections discuss the distinction between Buddhist metaphysical interdependence and scientifically verifiable ecological relationships, the role of Buddhist ethics and the First Precept, institutional and monastic environmental practices, Thai Buddhist environmental activism, Japanese animal-release rituals, and Buddhist representations of nonhuman animals. The concluding section evaluates the collection’s academic and pedagogical value, identifying it as a major but not definitive contribution to the study of Buddhism and ecology.

Copyright Notice

This material is provided solely for academic research, study, and religious practice purposes under Article 25 of Vietnam's Intellectual Property Law. Reproduction, distribution, or commercial use is strictly prohibited.

If you are the author, translator, publisher, or rights holder and believe this content has been posted without proper authorization, please contact us and we will promptly review and remove or restrict access.

Documents

Buddhism and Ecology: Balancing Convergence, Dissonance, and the Risk of Anachronism

108 KB

Keywords

Buddhism and ecologyenvironmental ethicsinterdependenceBuddhist ethicsnonhuman animalsecological hermeneuticsanachronism